23 October 2018
To Mr. President of WOS-IPSP
To the permanent and non-permanent members
To the Secretary General
Note Minutes 12/2018 People informed about the facts
In response to the letter from Mr president
Of the WOS-IPSP - Eugenio Lai
E. Mr. President Eugenio LAI,
with profound despondency and embarrassment, with the present I respond to his last “mental utterance” of October 15, 2018, without object and only with a series of numbers (as if it were a “table of commandments”), so it is different what you say consciously, standing up to a role as a professor which not only does not belong absolutely to you , (and I do not recognize) and that, indeed ... just laughs who knows a minimum of ..LAW, I explain you for the last time as actually the things are; then, possibly, ... could be the Mrs Judges to give you any other and further answers ... certainly NOT the undersigned!
I said with “deep discomfort” because I had believed in your “talented skills”, in fact you at first sight seems a “cultured man”, but unfortunately has shown that it is not so, and therefore has never given me a way to repudiate me thinking the contrary or, to put it better, it has shown great ignorance in many fields, especially legal, administrative, international legal, not even having the ability to be advised by lawyers and judges, or professors through sworn appraisals, pro veritate opinions, and by saying. I also said “with embarrassment”, just because, at first believed in you, I made myself “make fun of ... you”: for example, losing the sums I anticipated for the “WOS-IPSP” (4,500 €. ) for which there are the relative expense reports with related invoices and receipts, which NEVER will give me !!! In fact, you always talk about money, but only about those you want to cash in, never those to pay ... I learned to know you and ... I always remember you the e-mails passed and the recordings ...; or the three years that you made me lose to wait ... the WOS-IPSP subsidies from the World Bank and UN funds for humanitarian projects; that is your willingness to do or not do something, even against legem (for example, assemblies, advice, the assignment of useless assignments without any value and / or expectation as the WOS-IPSP has never had NO activity and NEVER has done any service in 4 years, etc., etc.), for then “take time”, trying to keep “good” those who rebelled against your “doing the tyrant”, or trying to “get them out” in the work, sponging on them, doing the low-level games to eliminate them from the “places of responsibility” for you inconvenient, as you tried to do with me; or even NOT INVITING THEM to be able to prove perhaps that ... “they are not worthy of the place they occupy”? For example, as you did on May 2, 2018, when you have NOT invited to the meeting for “PEACE” in Rome me and the States I represent (permanent members of which one with the right of veto and member of that General Security Council you NEVER wanted to validly convene and that, even on express request with the “Note Verbal” No. 11/2018, it still ... waits!).
And , Mr. President Lai, did you think I was so stupid that I did NOT see what you had done and what you were doing? Or did you think that after three years of “teasing” I would have made it a habit? No, I’m sorry, NOW it is enough, I’ve waited long enough!
So, returning to your “commandments”, I try to start to better understand the LEX, instead of “your interpretation for convenience”, but to do so I have to leave a few months before July 3, 2014, remembering you the details that you forgot, or you pretended to do it! I guess you still has in mind the fact that you, who wanted to keep the precedent, has fought so much with Dr. Bonventre who advised to do a “complete review” of the modus operandi of the “old” parliament, of the offices , of the members, etc., So, this professional and the appropriate Commission, prepared a “critical relationship” with respect to the old action, the statute and anything else but, until the morning of 3 July 2014, you put us “hand “, Upsetting much of the work done in 6 months of work. In any case, and in spite of some logical differences in some parts of the bylaws, I confirm you that the first part of the same (from page 04 to page 06) reports YOUR report (that is, the one prepared by the Commission and the President of the Assembly should have only read) which explained the terms, the reason and the procedural conditions with which the same Commission had prepared precisely that statute!
That part, Mr. LAI, is not a LEX, but the way it came to the statutory drafting, on the basis of a new vision, after about 40 years of life of the old parliament, obsolete for the new challenges of the times.
So, after these clarifications to enter into the merits and show the aspects of the different positions, I respond to your POINT of your PEC dated “Rome 15.10.2018” sent by “H.S.H Eugenio Lai “who recites in the introduction:
“ Dear Mr. Cesare Fussone, (Note: Lai knows that if he addresses a NOBLE, as you yourself qualify in the signature, YOU SHOULD USE THE TITLE that they HAVE the RIGHT? ... I think NO, ...YOU DO NOT KNOW IT, now you know !!!
With the present we send you a letter where all the laws of the Statute are present, clearly, exhaustive and unexceptionable .. ... NOW WE SEE
read well the contents of the letter and especially the articles it contains , to understand how things should work ... YES, IF FOR HIS CONVENIENCE ... CERTAINLY! ||
HSH Eugenio Lai IF YOU WRITE FOR THE “WORLD PARLIAMEN” (BUT IT IS NOT THE WOS-IPSP? OR YOU ARE CONFUSED?) must subscribe “ President of ... ..... “, and at the limit the academic title achieved if you have it. --------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ---------
The day 16/10/2018 at 09:45:51 (+0200) the message
“To HSH Cesare Fussone “DID YOU STILL HAVE NOT LEARN? MY TITLES (and suffixes) ARE OTHERS: H.R.H., H.S.H., H.E.H., etc., one only puts the major; that is, for the WOS-IPSP, it must uses: H.E. H. Dott. ....! (That is ... it would be the protocol!)
Open then the letter : “For fussone and his states.pdf”, they are evident the continuous errors of the places of “writing”, of sending the PEC, as well as of the established name of the organization that could be “WOS-IPSP” and NOT ONLY WOS, as well as “institutional”, “representative” offices, “actual offices”, etc. etc. But for all these matters, this General Chancellery will reply later; rather, having been placed the “game” in THESE TERMS, BECOME ESSENTIAL, and before anything else, as transmitted on 29 August 2014 by the “Principality of New Malta”, a permanent member with VETO right, with its own Note Verbal of the PRINCIPATE (which is transmitted in copy and can be seen directly on the WEB: http://www.wosipsp-chancellery.org/index.php/verbali-ed-atti/diritto-veto), to which you, mr. President Lai, NOT HAS NOT ACCEPTED ANY CONSIDERATION, ESTABLISHING AND ADMITTING SO ‘A “PRELIMINARY JURIDICAL” UNIQUE, INDISSOLUBLE, VERY SERIOUS, INCOMPARABLE, EXCLUSIVE, INCREDIBLE, UNBELIEVABLE, INDESTRUCTIBLE, EXTERNAL, UNJUSTABLE, LETHAL, EXCEPTIONAL !!! In practice, Mr. President LAI, a permanent member state with VETO right, places at the “General Council of Presidency” the preliminary ruling concerning the impossibility of autonomy of the same Council, with determination of REPORT! Well, Mr. president, what did you do? NOTHING, thus making absolutely NULL ALL THE ACTS of the World Parliament for Security and Peace ... “ab originem”, since August 2014!
Well, I think that everything I have told you so far could be enough to finally make you desist to still perform acts ... illegitimate or even illicit, but having promised “clear answers, irrefutable and undeniable”, so I hope, once and for all to close the question:
1) At the point one of your “letter”, which responds to this, I stop everything I have already written in the “In reply to the PEC of the President of WOS-IPSP on 12.10.18, and EXTRAJUDICIAL NOTICE” on October 15, 2018 13.33 and earlier, which here are repeated and attached, CONTINUES TO AFFIRM THAT “I HAVE CONTINUED THE WORKS. .. “-. I invite you e. Mr. president Lai, to change his mind about what illicitly affirms, for the reasons stated in the PEC mentioned above and ALL the inherent acts. I also formally invite the lawyer. Antonello Secchi, who reads us in copy as a person informed about the facts, in my capacity as Grand Chancellor in office until July 2, 2019, both as legal representative of State, permanent member with veto right, as well as delegate in the General Security Council of the WOS-IPSP, to illustrate professionally the “legal evidence” related to this statement, to Eugenio Lai, nq
2) For point 2 of your letter, I remember perfectly “that General Assembly” in extraordinary form, on July 3, 2014, so ‘is that I started THIS communication in response by specifying the “history” of those days and what led to the draft of that statute, since, among other things, remember, in the Commission I was also present!
3) and 3bis) [I think] I points 3 and 3 bis) that you report, highlight first of all an error: the page in question cited is 5 (five) and NOT 3 (three). Then you write: “The draft statutory system, which we submit for your approval, provides, as right, the separation of powers and the attribution of a full and exclusive right to the members of the General Assembly.” And according to what you highlight , continues:
4) “Members of the World Parliament for Security and Peace can not be other than the Member States, that is,those States that will accept the obligations established by the provisions of the Statute. Therefore, full and exclusive rights can not be attributed to those States that have not expressed their will to join our Organization! “E. Mr. President Lai, PERFECT, YOU HAVE READ THE SIGN !!! But it continues, in the following point 5) with a GREAT MISTAKE, that can leave in doubt your Intelligence .... in fact it continues ILLOGICALLY:
5) “Therefore, all the ordinary and extraordinary assemblies PREGRANT TO THE ASSEMBLY OF 28 JUNE 2016, WERE INEFFECTIVE, NULL, .... “.. sorry but it is imperative to pay close attention to the ‘mental lucubration’, illogical and therefore ignorant of ‘public, private, international law, etc., of the joint and specific responsibility, the’ legal personality of international law ‘exercised by States, and what else, that is stated and that follows: “WHY THE STATES PRESENT IN THE PERMANENT AND NON PERMANENT STATUTES DID NOT HAVE SUBMITTED THE APPLICATION FOR ADHESION” ...! But dear Mr. President Eugenio Lai, but what do you say? Are you sure of your statements? Have you consulted with a lawyer? I really think not because personally knowing the lawyer. Antonello Secchi, as a VERY professionally skilled person, [”elected WOS-IPSP Justice Minister” ( personally appointed by you)], I imagine that YOU HAD NOT FOUND HIM BY TELEPHONE! In fact, according to you, a State, regularly represented by its delegate-OFFICIAL, (see “VERIFICATION OF POWERS”), which participates in the drafting of the statutes and of the constitutional act, sub-scribes them and by legal personality of international law to the I.G.O. SO CONSTITUTED, IT MUST ALSO MAKE A REQUEST FOR ADMISSION ... .. TO WHOM? TO ITSELF? TO YOU? TO THE MAJOLESE SECRETARY? AND THESE WOULD BE JUST PERSONS PERFORMING FUNCTIONS (WITH THE OTHER FOR A TOTAL INITIAL TO 3.7.18) OF 8 STATES WHICH REGULARLY VOTE, SUBSCRIBING AND CONSTITUTING THE “INTER GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION. Do you realize that when this “answer to the President WOS-IPSP” arrives to the states with which you have entertained, or entertains, relationships, THEY WILL LAUGH?
6) “Dulcis in fundo”: mr. LAI president, but do you know that you are talking about a REPORT? Made because it was you who read it in the extraordinary assembly, highlighting what was before and what would be the new I.G.O. ? Do you know that a Lex is a thing (as for example the Statute and the Constitution Act, and it is a VERY DIFFERENT thing a point of view, a thought, “YOUR interpretation for convenience”, which “could also be interesting, if was for example explanatory “, but legally, placed in these illogical terms, has NO VALUE?, but you know why the” STATEMENT VARIATION “of the former Parliament, was carried out, in Rome (Italy), without the need of the notary, while otherwise for the Italian jurisdiction, would have been INDISPENSABLE? Please ask the lawyer Secchi, he will certainly tell you that it was precisely “those States” (with legal personality of international law) that you criticize, to give “title “To the statutory renewal of the parliament, through the constitution of the inter-governmental organization! Otherwise, if it was a constitution” of natural persons “, the lack of the public official in Ita ly, determines the invalidity, that is the absolute nullity, of every relative act, and from there to today! NEITHER YOU CAN THINK TO DO: “TODAY YES, TOMORROW NO”, IN FACT WHO SHOULD HAVE TO TAKE THE PAPER? IN A MIXED SHAPE THE NOTARY, IN A FORM OF PHYSICAL PERSONS, ALWAYS THE NOTARY, ... ONLY WITH THE ACTION ESTABLISHED BY LEGAL PERSONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW THE SAME STATES ARE, SUPER PARTES, WHICH DETERMINE THE CORRECT APPLICATION OF THE LAW AT INTERNATIONAL LEVEL. So what do you want to do, Mr. President? To set EVERYTHING and return to the old “World Parliament for Security and Peace”? Or continue and move on, CLOSING ALL THE VIEWS WITH THIS STATIONERY; SETTING UP THE PREGRANT STATUS OF IRREGULARITY STARTING FROM THE GENERAL SAFETY COUNCIL, CALLING THE 7 FOUNDING STATES; PRESENTING ALL THE BUDGETS TO THIS ADMINISTRATIVE BODY, CGS, FOR THE PREVENTIVE AUTHORIZATION TO THE APPROVAL REQUEST TO ASK TO THE ORDINARY GENERAL ASSEMBLY; DELIVER ALL THE ACTS TO THE CGS FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THAT IN THESE YEARS THE CGP HAS DONE, WITHOUT NEVER GIVING ANY REPORT TO THE CGS, AS PROVIDED BY THE STAFF REGULATIONS; and so forth!
7) Going forward, you affirm the biggest and most obvious phallus, in fact you say that: “The historical members who voted to deliberate the Statute and the proposal for the adhesion of the States admitted by the General Assembly, they have not formalized the application for membership of the Organization ... “, but president Lai, do you want to ends up saying “nonsense“? You would say that “if we make a company, you and I, and I do not” formalize a DEMAND FOR MEMBERSHIP TO THE COMPANY “, AM I A MEMBER? ... .. And you continue: “therefore the General Council of Security could not exist except on paper, with the exception of the Council of Presidency elected by the General Assembly on December 2013 and always confirmed by the General Assembly on 3 July 2014, established and voted by the historical members.” So What would you like to confirm? First of all, YOU DO NOT REMEMBER that the “General Council of Presidency” has NEVER been elected by the General Assembly on December 3, 2013 because instead on that occasion the “Office of Presidency” was created and this body appears for the first time since 3 July 2014 Instead, try to see the LEX and not your “mental ruminations”: in fact, at the time of the constitution there are only 8 states “giving rights”, 5 permanent members of which 4 forming the General Council of Security and with “right of veto “and 3 NOT permanent. These, by statute, form the members of the administrative body with full powers, then, FOR THE WILL ‘OF “MEMBERS-STATES” CONSTITUTED, IS NOW ACCOUNT OF RECOGNITION AND THEREFORE OF LIFE, TO THE PREVIOUS “OFFICE OF PRESIDENCY THAT KEEPS THE CHARGES: “TRANSITIONAL DISPOSITIONS”, art. 1 paragraph III, Page 24, On chapter n. 3) placed on the agenda, on the proposal of the President,with the unanimity of votes, the General Assembly resolves to confirm, until 2 July 2019, the persons elected to the associative positions by the General Assembly on December 5, 2013. “consequently THERE ARE BOTH ADMINISTRATIVE BODIES: THE PRIMARY, GENERAL SECURITY COUNCIL, COMPLETE, COUNCILORS STATES WITH THE VETO RIGHT that also includes THE SECONDARY, GENERAL COUNCIL OF PRESIDENCY ( ALL those former directors appointed on December 5, 2013 and in charge until 2 July 2019), FOR STATUTES and FOR ITS MEMORY! If what explained here DOES NOT convince you again, before making further CRIMES or saying nonsenses, I invite you to be explained by a lawyer (internationalist?) How the EVERYTHING works and get released by him a “PRO VERITATE OPINION” undersigned, as a part expertise , to be valid abroad.
8) Also for your memory, mr. President Lai, remember that: Sheet 14, Article 15, paragraph 5, “The General Security Council is invested with the most extensive and unlimited powers for the ordinary and extraordinary management of the Association, without exception of any kind and more particularly conferred all the powers for the implementation and achievement of the goals, which are not in an exhaustive manner reserved by the present Statute to the General Assembly “- Sheet 12, Article 2.3.4,” The permanent members of the General Security Council they have the right of veto in all the organizations of the Association. - The General Security Council is the administrative and economic governance body of the World Parliament for Security and Peace. - Permanent members with a right of veto are the State of Antarcticland, the State of Sao Tornò Prince, the Principality of New Malta and the Principality of King. - Article 14, “The General Council of Security may appoint, in its womb, an executive committee called the General Council of the Presidency” - Sheet 13, Article 14, paragraphs 6 and 7, “The General Council of the Presidency, when constituted, except for the limitations established by the General Security Council, it has powers of ordinary and extraordinary administration. The signature powers remain, in any case, in the hands of the President of the Association. - The resolutions of the General Council of the Presidency are brought to the attention of the General Security Council in the first subsequent meeting.
“So, dear president, as you see I READ VERY WELL THE LEX, I TRIED AND REPORTED, NOW, once and for all. FOR THE GOOD OF THIS ORGANIZATION, DO YOU WANT TO FINALLY FINISH TO SUPPORT “INDIFENDABLE CAUSES?” I understand that you were wrong with your statements, but to prove your good faith, you just need to get back into yourself or get from a serious professional in the legal sector, the “OPINION PRO VERITATE” signed, as an expert opinion, to be worth abroad, of which I spoke above. You have to Understand that, not for “badness, malice, hostility or presumption” but for “ professional ethics” I have to defend my convictions, even if these can go against your interests.
9) In the point 7 of your letter in question, e. Mr. LAI president, states: “The historical members during the Assembly have admitted the fact and not by right the permanent and non-permanent states, [that is, they continue to affirm that it was only and always an” ASSOCIATION WITH PHYSICAL PERSONS OR MIXED? THEREFORE THE NOTARY WAS NECESSARY, YOU HAVE “DECLARED THE FALSE” AT THE LAWYER ADAMI IN LUGANO AND ... ALL THE ACTS TODAY ARE .... N U L L ! BUT ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THE THINGS YOU SAY?) AND STILL, SAME ARTICLE: “... The States that have not partially regularized membership of the Organization, therefore are deprived of the right to vote. [and how should they have regularized? Paying something? For which and how many services? With an administration held by you, which has not presented the financial statements for at least 3 years, you do not show the supporting documents, which you claim to have over € 500,000. of debts which, if recognized only as a “private association”? ... ,] Continuing that point 7 of your letter, you say again: “... I remind you that during the opening and the beginning of the work you have exercised strong obstructionism, and always you, in the course of opening of the works, have clearly declared that the States admitted to the assembly by the historical members as well as constituents were signatories, absolutely not true, did not sign anything, much less presented an application to join (associate) the WOS -I.P.S.P. “Poor mr. President ... ! ... would you like to equalize the fact that, politically in the previous ones, I told you that you were lying? Now would you say that I’m the liar? Mr. Lai and these what and who would they be? ... Tell me that so you would demonstrate a lack of memory, a count climbing on the mirrors and also you blame others of your presumption: “that the Republic of Sao Tome Prince has delegated the exercise of its right to vote to H.S.H. C. S. Fussone; that the Principality of King has delegated the exercise of its right to vote to H.E. Dr. Giuseppe Caddeo; that the State of Antarcticiand has delegated the exercise of its right to vote to H.S.H. Eugenio Lai; that the Principality of West Antarctic has delegated the exercise of its right to vote to H.E. Sen. Ciro di Costanzo; that the Principality of New Malta has delegated the exercise of its right to vote to H.E. ! ‘Lawyer. Antonello Secchi; that the Principality of Thurston has delegated the exercise of its right to vote to H.E. the lawyer. Yevdokymov Valeryi “-. So I refer you to ALL the previous and what I affirmed correctly, against your wrong interpretations ...
10) At your point 8, instead you give the hoe on the feet, in fact he states: “Another point, even if issued a decree of adhesion of the UTA “... that is, IN ITS PRIVATE ASSOCIATION and NOT RECOGNIZED, THE LAWS DO NOT EXIST, THE STATUTE IS BUT IT IS INVISIBLE, ETC.,LAI WE ARE TALKING ABOUT STATES, WHO ARE YOU THAT STRICT THE TRUTH OF THE FACTS? ... AND YOU CONTINUE: “the applications for association of the States to the UTA have never been produced” AND WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO DO WITH THE U.T.A.? FIRST DO YOU DO SOMETHING AND THEN DO YOU REMOVE IT? ... as well as you complete and say: “... let alone the paper request if not verbal is never formalized, (among other things the decree will be subjected to verification on the regularity of the documents produced.” BUT TO WHOM? DO YOU REALIZE THAT, IF WOS IS DETERMINED AS A PRIVATE ASSOCIATION AND NOT IGO, YOU MIGHT HAVE MADE FUN A LOT OF PEOPLE , ... ME TOO? ... “Apparently the reasons were all on the part of Prof. Geromin”, he would be the engineer mechanic, archaeologist or professor of letters? Would he be a scientist of international law? .. a lawyer? ... a judge? Lai but do you realize that with every word you only say nonsense, ... without culture!
11) At the point 9 argues: “It is possible that until the revocation and appointment of the new Grand Chancellor” ... (it remains always ignorance SPECIFIC LEGAL in the pure state: BY STATUTE MY CHARGE DECADE ON 2 JULY 2019!) .... “Do you know the points 3 and 4 of the Statute? (A STATUTE HAS ITEMS, PARAGRAPHS ETC., WHICH WOULD BE THE “POINTS”? ... “It seems strange that such important parties you have forgotten or left out, maybe that is why you asked for the ratification of all previous acts? Sorry, it was and it is only because I do not trust you and especially to avoid having to be forced to repay assets and money for your wrong positions, I’m sorry but this is the risk and I’m no longer willing to lose more money for you.] “ I remind you that even the Grand Chancellor had to highlight the incongruities and present a report to put order, but you have created disharmony and obstructionism. “ ... THE WEBSITE SHOWS ALL THE ERRORS THAT YOU HAVE DONE AND CONTINUE TO DO ... AND THEN THERE ARE MAIL AND OTHER ....!
12) E. LORD, EUGENIO LAI, I REMEMBER YOU FOR THE LAST TIME THAT MY INTENT, FOR THE GOOD OF THE MEMBER STATES AND AGAINST YOUR DESPOTISM, IT IS AND IT WILL BE A CONGRATIOUS ACTION FOR MY IMAGE, MY HERITAGE, MY PERSON, ETC., AND ALL THOSE THAT I REPRESENT! THEREFORE DO AS YOU BELIEVE, WE WILL SEE IN COURT ...
AND AGAIN: “The State of Antarcticland, Thurston, New Malta and non-permanent States currently have not signed any association request with IPSP WOS, therefore they do not have the right to vote during the assemblies pursuant to art. 1 chapter 2, [SORRY BUT WHAT WOULD IT BE? THE ARTICLES ARE FROM 1 (ONE) TO 38 (THIRTYEIGHT) AND WHAT WOULD IT SAY? IF NOT: “Art. 1, The World Parliament for Security and Peace maintains the same name as it was established, with the accession of the Presidents of the Republics of Mali and Senegal, on December 15, 1975, by Mgr. Makarios III, first President of the Republic of Cyprus (1960 -1974), and by Mons. Vittorio Maria Busà, already mentioned, as constituent of the World Parliament for Security and Peace, in the sentence of the Italian Constitutional Court no. 193/1985 on 28 June 1985. It is specified that this Association was registered as a legal entity at the Registry of the Court of Palermo on 25 October 1996 under no. 725 vol. 4 pag. 19 and that, subsequently, to the World Parliament for Security and Peace has been assigned, by the Ministry of Finance of the Italian Republic, with the tax code no. 97083640827. - 2) The World Parliament for Security and Peace, being a free association between States, has a legal personality of international law “. WHAT DO YOU WANT TO SAY? I REFER YOU AS STATED IN THE FIRST PAGES: IN PALERMO THERE IS NO MORE A REGISTRATION!
Art.4 paragraph 5, “A member of the General Assembly of the World Parliament for Security and Peace who is in arrears of at least 2 (two) years in the payment of his financial contributions to the Association loses the right to vote in the General Assembly. “ ... YOU ALWAYS MEAN OF MONEY , ...! BUT MY € 4,500. / FOURTHOUSANDFIVEHUNDRED / WHEN YOU GIVE THEM TO ME? WHERE, HOW WHEN AND HOW MUCH ASKED A PAYMENT FOR STATES? SORRY, BUT TO DO THAT, CONSIDERING THAT THERE WERE NO ANY ACTIVITY? MAYBE TO PAY YOUR SECRETARY OR GIVE HER A CACHET FOR YOUR CAGLIARI OFFICE? I NEVER ASK FOR ANYTHING NEITHER FOR MY OFFICE NEITHER FOR THE SERVICES AND THE COMMITORS: ALL FOR FREE AND AS A VOLUNTEER! WHY DO YOU NOT SEND THE STATES WHICH COMPOSE THE GENERAL SECURITY COUNCIL FOR BUDGETS SINCE 2014? MAYBE YOU HAVE NOT PRESENTED THE BUDGETS OF THE WOS-IPSP.
WHILE FOR THE ART. 24 paragraphs 1 and 2. HAS MESSED, IN FACT RECITES: “1. The Extraordinary Assembly is convened solely for the modification of the Statute and validly resolves in the first convocation with the presence of so many members representing two thirds of all the Acceding States, registered in the World Parliament for Security and Peace, and in second convocation with the presence of many members representing at least fifty percent of the member states. Acceding States and members of the World Parliament for Security and Peace must be in compliance with the payment of the financial contributions pursuant to art. 4, paragraph 6, of this Statute. 2) The Extraordinary Assemblies to be declared valid also require the presence of at least fifty percent of the permanent members of the General Security Council, (so what are the 4 states - out of 7 validly constituted by statute - that would have been present? ... Even the late call and then changed has affected EVERYTHING) EVEN THIS YOU DEFEAT !!! BUT DO NOT CLIMB again ON THE MIRRORS! LAI.
14) In any case and anyway, both as Grand Chancellor in office until July 2, 2019 and as the legal representative of 2 (two) permanent Member States with veto right, also in the General Security Council of the WOS-IPSP and 1 (one) permanent without right of veto, I PRESENT THE ABSOLUTE INADEQUATE OF THE POSITIONS ASSUMED BY MR. PRESIDENT EUGENIO LAI, AND TO THE ‘SAFEGUARDY OF THE STATES THAT MAKE THIS I.G.O. FOR OVER 4 YEARS, WHO HAVE SUBMITTED THE CONSTITUTE ACT, UNDERTAKING TO ACCEPT THE OBLIGATIONS ESTABLISHED BY THE STAFF REGULATIONS THAT THE SAME HAS BEEN DONE AND PLACE TO BE IN ROME, IN VIA VITTORIO VENETO, 118, ON 3 JULY OF 2014, FOR EVERYONE INDISTINCTLY IT PLACES OFFICIAL REQUEST OF THE CONVOCATION OF THE GENERAL COUNCIL OF SECURITY.
15) FINALLY, HAVING CHECKED A GENERAL LITIGATION OF NON-EASY SOLUTION, BECAUSE OF THE POSITIONS ASSUMED WITHIN THIS ORGANIZATION, AND ALWAYS FOR THE SAFEGUARDING OF THE STATES THAT MEET THIS IGO FOR OVER 4 YEARS, WHO HAVE SUBMITTED THE CONSTITUTIVE ACT, UNDERTAKING TO ACCEPT THE OBLIGATIONS ESTABLISHED BY THE STAFF REGULATIONS THAT THE SAME HAS BEEN DONE AND PLACE TO BE IN ROME, IN VIA VITTORIO VENETO, 118, 3 JULY 2014, the undersigned, as the legal representative of 2 (two) permanent Member States with a right of veto, also in the General Security Council of WOS-IPSP AND, FOR THE TWO STATES WHO HAVE THE RIGHT, HAVING REGARD TO THE STATUTE, CHAPTER II, TITLE IV, ART. 13 COMMI 1,2,3,4,5, STATES THE RIGHT OF “VETO” ON EVERY ACT OF THE GENERAL PRESIDENCY COUNCIL, WITH POLICY AND ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTING RIGHTS, PREGRATED (starting from 29.08.2014), CURRENT AND FUTURE UNTIL THE EFFECTIVE ARRANGEMENT OF THE CONTENTIOUS IN BEING, ANNOUNCED BETWEEN THE PARTIES, as well as the consequent eventual CONVOCATION OF THE OTHER STATUTORY BODIES, WITHOUT THE PREVENTIVE BENESTATION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE BODY, OF THE GENERAL SECURITY COUNCIL, especially for the agenda.
E. Mr. President Lai, I do not think I have anything else to say to you, you have only proven with facts what you actually are, and, under these conditions with all these low-level tricks, ... I have no interest in having relationships with you ! However, I hope that you DO NOT repent of the wrongdoings that you have combined and that you can have even a minimum of reason, because, if it should NOT be, the people who follow you ... for NOTHING ... could be obliged in solid to pay for your nonsenses.
In any case, EVERYTHING I have said to you, in defense of my direct and indirect interests, I will do it and, according to your statements and your obstinacy, I think that I will be forced in spite of myself to bring you into a court.